services | perspectives | media room | careers | about us
What is Nearshore?
Nearshore is "the transfer of business or IT processes to companies in a nearby country, often sharing a border with your own country", where both parties expect to benefit from one or more of the following dimensions of proximity: geographic, temporal (time zone), cultural, linguistic, economic, political, or historical linkages.
RSS Feed Subscribe to this blog's feed

Delivered by FeedBurner

Analysis and insights regarding the IT outsourcing industry & technology perspectives. Contributors of this blog include journalists of Nearshore Americas and of Softtek. The views expressed in the content by Nearshore Americas, or any other author, do not necessarily reflect the position of Softtek.
Nearshore Outsourcing
Softtek created the nearshore concept in 1997. While the nearshore industry is maturing nicely, there is still room for growth. This space is dedicated to providing our takes and perspectives on nearshoring across the globe.
The Process of Creating
Creativity, while in its essence is free of rules, follows a process. A discussion of the evolution of services, this blog allows us to participate and share our thoughts and ideas more openly during a time of disruptive IT evolution.

Follow us
Dennis Barker
Dennis Barker
March 17, 2012 at 12:24 AM

An Outsourcing Giant Falls Down in Texas

FiredOne of the greatest flops in outsourcing history came to an end this week. It was a sad tale of epic failure by a legendary IT company. Unlike some sad tales of epic failure, this one offers no moment of redemption. It just makes you scratch your head and wonder, "How the heck did this happen?"

What happened was IBM blew it. One of the biggest IT services companies in the world could not deliver what it promised, and the customer finally said, "Goodbye."

It all started in 2006 when the State of Texas contracted with IBM to consolidate and then manage some datacenters used by a bunch of state agencies. Client and provider signed an $800 million deal through 2013. But as InformationWeek's Paul McDougall reported – and McDougall has been all over this story for years – "the project quickly fell off track amid scheduling conflicts and high-profile service outages that threatened to compromise sensitive data."

In 2008, the governor ordered a temporary halt to the work, and then in 2010 the Lone Star state decided to find another provider. Officials reached an undisclosed agreement with IBM. Then this week, they turned it all over to two other very large providers.

So, what went wrong? A Texas IT director says IBM wanted to do much of the work remotely, but Texas wanted the IBM staffers operating in state offices in Austin. IBM says the state "failed to perform necessary preparation work, such as application remediation." The Texas IT guy did concede that there was lots of infighting among various state departments – people resisted the change to consolidated datacenters. Sure, clients can be difficult.

But based on most reports, it was IBM that really botched it. Complaints cited by the Texas governor included IBM's alleged failure to back up systems for 20 state agencies. The Dallas Morning News said an IBM server failure in one case had caused the loss of months' worth of data.

Meanwhile, IBM has had other troubles in Texas. MacDougall again:

"IBM's contract to provide a Texas utility with state-of-the-art billing systems has sunk into such a quagmire of missed deadlines, buggy software, and costly errors that the utility's CIO said he's "gravely concerned" about whether IBM can fix the problems.

"We have yet to reach a stable system," said Austin Energy CIO Alan Claypool, in an email to an IBM exec dated Feb. 10. "We are extremely disappointed and continue to have serious concerns about the quality of service we have received from IBM to date." The system, which was supposed to go online early last year, is still not up and running.

Read MacDougall's InformationWeek story for the details. This episode is even more of a head-scratcher than the fiasco described above. You have to wonder how a multibillion-dollar company with all the resources in the world, and many thousands of bright employees, could go so far astray. You have to wonder if there's such a thing as too big.

The lesson a Texas official said they've learned is that perhaps it's not a good idea to enlist just one provider for a massive IT project. Their new model involves multiple providers managed by what's called a master services integrator.

I wonder what lesson IBM officials have learned from these two outsourcing disasters in Austin. Don't mess with Texas?


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference An Outsourcing Giant Falls Down in Texas:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.